​Research Enfield Council Based The Decision To Commence Licensing Of Private Landlords On.

Enfield Council based their decision to commence licensing of private landlords on a flawed study by an obscure consulting group known as NKM titled "Understanding The Relationship Between Private Rented Properties And Anti-Social Behavior In Enfield".  Here are extracts from a critical appraisal of the NKM Study:

ASB Data Highlights




Sources Of Error In The Analysis.

Weaknesses Of The Study


Does this study stand up to scrutiny?



[i] Ellis PD. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: An Introduction to Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis and the Interpretation of Research Results.  Cambridge University Press. 2010

[ii] Cramer D.  Advanced quantitative data analysis.  Open University Press, Maidenhead. 2003


[iii] Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The Abuse of Power. The American Statistician 2001; 55:19-24


[iv] Ellis PD. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge University Press 2010; p. 52.


[v] Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research.  1st Edition. Chapman & Hall 1991


[vi] Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 597-9


[vii] Bacchetti P. Peer review of statistics in research: the other problem. BMJ 2002; 324: 1271 – 1273


[viii] Eysenck HJ. An exercise in mega-silliness. Am Psychol. 1978; 33: 517


[ix] Huque MF. Experiences with meta-analysis in NDA submissions. Proc Biopharmaceutical section. Am Statist Assoc 1988; 2: 28-33


[x] Egger M, Davey Smith G. Misleading meta-analysis. Lessons from “an effective safe, simple” intervention that wasn’t.  BMJ 1995; 310: 752-4


[xi] Egger M, Davey Smith G, Meta-analysis: bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 1998 316:61-66